Tuesday 28 July 2015

Why we use 0.45 micron pore size filter in Sterility testing but 0.22 micron pore size filter during filtration?

There are different grade and pore size filters are available in the market. But for sterility testing only 0.45 micron pore size filter is recommended in different pharmacopoeias. First question comes in mind that many bacteria are present in the environment which are smaller than 0.45 micron pore size like Brevundimonas diminuta then why don't we use 0.22 micron pore size filter which can retain these small size bacteria instead of 0.45 micron? Can bacteria smaller than 0.45 micron size pass through the filter paper of 0.45 micron if yes then why we are using 0.45 pore size? Can't we use 0.22 micron pore size filter for sterility testing? There are different questions comes in mind and create confusion.

     
Sterility test 
Sterility test
When we perform sterility testing we use 0.45 micron filter but when we prepare and filter the disinfectant solution we use 0.22 micron filter. During batch preparation of SVP, LVP and liquid injections we also use 0.22 micron pore size filter for filtration of batch. The reason behind these questions is the purpose of using these filters. Being a microbiologist, I will explain you every aspects of this concept. First let we understand the morphology of the filter paper with particular pore size. Actually membrane filters are not having the single uniform sized holes passing from top to bottom , but they are ramification of channels through their whole thickness. So, because of morphology of filters its not possible for microorganism to pass thorough the filter. Therefore a filter of 0.45 micron size can retain large number of microbial cells smaller than the 0.45 micron.
In microbiology we perform sterility testing to check any viable contamination in product/sample by observing turbidity in the SCDM (Soyabean casein digest medium)  or FTM (Fluid thioglycollate medium) media. If viable contamination is present in the sample then it could be retained on the filter paper during sample filtration and during incubation we could detect that contamination. But what happen if we can't detect the contamination which is present in the product or during sterility testing if we unintentionally destroy the contaminating microorganisms which were already present in the sample. It will leads to false negative results which means contamination was present in the original sample but because of our testing problem or errors we couldn't detect the contamination in the product. That might cause release of sterility failure batch in market. Here in sterility testing our priority is to detect the contamination if present in the product. That is also mentioned in the pharmacopoeia that the test must be carried out under aseptic conditions designed to avoid accidental contamination of the product during testing. For achieving these conditions, a grade A laminar airflow cabinet or an isolator is recommended. The test environment has to be adapted to the way in which the tests are performed. Precautions taken for this purpose should not adversely affect any microorganisms, which are to be revealed in the tests. The test is designed to reveal the presence of microorganisms in the samples used in the test. During sterility we apply vacuum for filtration of sample, if we use 0.45 micron filter then microorganisms could be easily retained on the filter paper and the applied vacuum will not have impact on the viability of the microorganism involved in the test but if we use 0.22 micron filter paper stringent pore size and applied vacuum leads to damage of microbial cell which will not further recover during the incubation time. That's why we use 0.45 micron pore size filter for sterility testing.
                                                                                           
0.22 micron filter
0.45 micron filter
But during filtration of disinfectants or any liquid batch we use 0.22 micron pore size filter because in that our main purpose is to get sterile solution by removing the contamination from the solution whether live or dead it doesn't matter but the thing matters is that the solution must be sterile. Filtration is one of the method of sterilization. So, by filtering through 0.22 micron filter all form of contamination could be removed. That's why we use 0.22 micron pore size filter for filtration.







Thanks and have a nice day:)














18 comments:

  1. thank. . . 100X
    its nice and basic concept . . thanxx again. . .@ S.I.Hussain. . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. thank. . . 100X
    its nice and basic concept . . thanxx again. . .@ S.I.Hussain. . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Syed Irshad Hussain for your valuable comment.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for clearing this concept.

      Delete
  3. Dear Sandeep,

    lots of information very useful for biology people. thanks a lot.

    best regards
    Murugan Chinnu
    Singapore

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Sandeep,

    Good evening. Iam really happy to see this blog as it happened today 26.10.2016 having this question(Use of 0.45 micron in sterility instead of 0.22 micron).

    I got the clarification and i really appreciate for your efforts to bring pharmaceutical microbiology people together.

    I also have another question in Mind.

    Why is the acceptance criteria for biological Indicator NLT50% to NMT 300% . Why can't it be factor 2 as for MLT /GPT acceptance criteria.
    S.Ravi.
    Chennai.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Sandip, A liquid injectable product is terminally sterilized after filtering through 0.45 micron filter. Could you please advise if a pre and post use filter integrity testing is required for 0.45 micron filter?

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi, i have problem in reporting the result. i have a DI water sample.i do both membrane filtration and pour plate plate method. i found that the membrane filtration result is 80 cfu/100ml but the pour plate results is 100cfu/1ml. the results seem weird because 1ml testing result is more than 100ml.will the bacteria passed through the 0.45um membrane filter due to small size?for membrane filtration method,i used 37mm filter unit with 0.45um membrane.i used syringe to draw the water without using vaccum pump.after tht, i put ampouled media to the filter unit.for pour plate method i just pipette 1 ml to plate and pour agar. anyone has clue about my results?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is not the problem of filter but the method which you are using. Membrane filtration method is more reliable then pour plate method because in membrane filtration method you can filter the large volume of water sample and get more reliable and accurate results. But in case of pour plate method you just test 1.0 ml sample of water in duplicate and hence not getting reliable data as compared to membrane filtration method.

      Thanks

      Delete
  8. I am not at all convinced with your answer,
    1) u only captured products which are sterilised by filteration but what about products which are terminally sterilised?
    2) U said, pressure n smaller pore size can kill Microorganisms but what about the MO’s which’s are of smaller size and got filtered out due to big pore size whereas these are still present in product.
    3) What about water MLT?? Question 2 applies there also.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Articles and content in this section of the website are really amazing. Great ideas indeed! I will surely keep this in my mind!
    filtration membrane

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  11. how much liquid sample we can filter in 0.45 micron filter in sterility testing

    ReplyDelete
  12. Maximum 100 mLx5 times per filter

    ReplyDelete